Wednesday, October 16, 2013
Sunday, October 13, 2013
Friday, October 11, 2013
Dean Clifford's journey with unraveling the legal system and finding freedom started over a decade ago when the Canada Revenue Agency came after him for not filing taxes in which they demanded him to pay over 3 times his earning. This wasn't acceptable with him and so he set out to find out how governments manage to force their policy onto the people with impunity. What he discovered was mind blowing. Since then, he has managed to correct his status and undo almost every deceitful contract he was originally tricked into. The CRA is still unable to prosecute him. Dean delivers seminars, conducts interviews and gives consultations about his discoveries and his lawful remedy in addition to his contracting business. He returns to detail his recent arrest in Canada where he was then held in a maximum security prison in solitary confinement for his political beliefs. He'll explain how he was released without prosecution, proving his research and method to be true. Then, we'll discuss the difference between natural law and artificial law. Dean talks about the importance of knowing your natural rights. In the second hour, we discuss our current government model system and the ridiculous notion that society cannot exist without government. We'll discuss how government is our creation gone mad but buried underneath still exists natural law. At the end of the day there is only mankind, no government. Later, Dean deconstructs the biggest freeman myth, the idea that money is evil. The hour ends on the importance of you as an individual to counteract all lies, agendas and governments. Evil triumphs when good men do nothing. Dean talks about what is next in his case against Canada and their recent human rights violations against him. He'll also address fear mongers and say why the U.S. won't wage war on its people.
Friday, September 27, 2013
Monday, September 23, 2013
Friday, September 20, 2013
Wednesday, September 18, 2013
Are you a "U.S. Citizen?" Or are you an "American Citizen?"
Did you know that the definition of "U.S." or "United States" has three different definitions:
1) It may be the name of a sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in the family of nations, [as in the United Nations]
2) It may designate territory over which the sovereignty of the federal government extends, [Federal Zone]
3) The name of the 50 States of the Union, which are united by and under the Constitution of the United States of America [ratified 1789]. [The Republic]
Which one are you? On legal documents such as when your parents filled out a Social Security Card application, or in any American court, if you do not specify which one, the U.S. Government or the courts get to "presume" you are number 2. This is not a good thing. Watch and learn why.
Links to documents mentioned:
Assumption of Liability http://novasector.net:4280/files/lega...
Affidavit of Expatriation http://novasector.net:4280/files/lega...
Thank you for watching this video. Knowledge is power!
Tuesday, September 17, 2013
Sunday, September 15, 2013
ThinkFree.ca, http://HijackingHumanity.com and DivergentFilms brings you the limited edition version of The Magnificent Deception, Rob Menard's newest video on the concepts of Freedom, Law, and Commerce, and how they relate to Persons, Humans, and Freesouls-On-Land. Learn about the Notice of Understanding and Intent, and also the Claim of Right process. This is the preview version of the Sequel to Bursting Bubbles of Government Deception
Saturday, September 14, 2013
Santos Bonacci on Quantum Leap TV with Johnny Guzman. Recorded in May 2013.
'Quantum Leap TV presents Syncretism The Science of Light in Vilcabamba Ecuador... Join host Johnny Guzman and special guest Santos Bonacci, Keung Man and Daren Clayton... In This interview Johnny and Santos are in beautiful Vilcabamba Ecuador recording for the film "Syncretism".... Please visit our web page: www.bonaccithefilm.com and help us with your donations... For all of our previous shows subscribe to our YouTube Channel: QL Television...
Wednesday, September 11, 2013
In this video I document how the Freeman On The Land movement has been attacked by the Vancouver Sun, and offer insight to the viewer onto how learning about the Freeman On The Land movement has affected my life personally. They also personally attack Dean Clifford, a great educator on the legal system in Canada.
The article can be read here: http://www.vancouversun.com/news/metr...
Know your rights.
A debtor can remove right of implied access by displaying a notice at the entrance. This was endorsed by Lord Justice Donaldson in the case of Lambert v Roberts  72 Cr App R 223 - and placing such a notice is akin to a closed door but it also prevents a bailiff entering the garden or driveway, Knox v Anderton  Crim LR 115 or R. v Leroy Roberts  EWCA Crim 2753
Debtors can also remove implied right of access to property by telling him to leave: Davis v Lisle  2 KB 434 similarly, McArdle v Wallace  108 Sol Jo 483
A person having been told to leave is now under a duty to withdraw from the property with all due reasonable speed and failure to do so he is not thereafter acting in the execution of his duty and becomes a trespasser with any subsequent levy made being invalid and attracts a liability under a claim for damages, Morris v Beardmore  71 Cr App 256.
Bailiffs cannot force their way into a private dwelling, Grove v Eastern Gas  1 KB 77
Otherwise a door left open is an implied license for a bailiff to enter, Faulkner v Willetts  Crim LR 453 likewise a person standing back to allow the bailiff to walk through but the bailiff must not abuse this license by entering by improper means or by unusual routes, Ancaster v Milling  2 D&R 714 or Rogers v Spence  M&W 571
Ringing a doorbell is not causing a disturbance, Grant v Moser  5 M&G 123 or R. v Bright 4 C&P 387 nor is refusing to leave a property causes a disturbance, Green v Bartram  4 C&P 308 or Jordan v Gibbon  8 LT 391
Permission for a bailiff to enter may be refused provided the words used are not capable of being mistaken for swear words, Bailey v Wilson  Crim LR 618.
If the entry is peaceful but without permission then a request to leave should always be made first. Tullay v Reed  1 C&P 6 or an employee or other person can also request the bailiff to leave, Hall v Davis  2 C&P 33
Excessive force must be avoided, Gregory v Hall  8 TR 299 or Oakes v Wood  2 M&W 791
A debtor can use an equal amount of force to resist a bailiff from gaining entry, Weaver v Bush  8TR, Simpson v Morris  4 Taunt 821, Polkinhorne v Wright  8QB 197. Another occupier of the premises or an employee may also take these steps: Hall v Davis  2 C&P 33.
Also wrongful would be an attempt at forcible entry despite resistance, Ingle v Bell  1 M&W 516
Bailiffs cannot apply force to a door to gain entry, and if he does so he is not in the execution of his duty, Broughton v Wilkerson  44 JP 781
A Bailiff may not encourage a third party to allow the bailiff access to a property (ie workmen inside a house), access by this means renders the entry unlawful, Nash v Lucas  2 QB 590
The debtor's home and all buildings within the boundary of the premises are protected against forced entry, Munroe & Munroe v Woodspring District Council  Weston-Super-Mare County Court
Contrast: A bailiff may climb over a wall or a fence or walk across a garden or yard provided that no damage occurs, Long v Clarke & another  1 QB 119
It is not contempt to assault a bailiff trying to climb over a locked gate after being refused entry, Lewis v Owen  The Times November 6 p.36b (QBD)
If a bailiff enters by force he is there unlawfully and you can treat him as a trespasser. Curlewis v Laurie  or Vaughan v McKenzie  1 QB 557
A debtor cannot be sued if a person enters a property uninvited and injures himself because he had no legal right to enter, Great Central Railway Co v Bates  3 KB 578
If a bailiff jams his boot into a debtors door to stop him closing, any levy that is subsequently made is not valid: Rai & Rai v Birmingham City Council  or Vaughan v McKenzie  1 QB 557 or Broughton v Wilkerson  44 JP 781
If a bailiff refuses to leave the property after being requested to do so or starts trying to force entry then he is causing a disturbance, Howell v Jackson  6 C&P 723 - but it is unreasonable for a police officer to arrest the bailiff unless he makes a threat, Bibby v Constable of Essex  Court of Appeal April 2000.
Vaughan v McKenzie  1 QB 557 if the debtor strikes the bailiff over the head with a full milk bottle after making a forced entry, the debtor is not guilty of assault because the bailiff was there illegally, likewise R. v Tucker at Hove Trial Centre Crown Court, December 2012 if the debtor gives the bailiff a good slap.
If a person strikes a trespasser who has refused to leave is not guilty of an offence: Davis v Lisle  2 KB 434
Monday, September 2, 2013
He drives without a license and does not pay income tax.
Brian Alexander is a self-proclaimed Freeman-on-the-Land and one of a growing number of Canadian followers of the so-called “sovereign citizen” or “Natural Persons” movement.
Adherents have “freed” themselves from what they see as an overbearing government that has overstepped its bounds.
“People can’t afford to live and they’re basically destroying society, in our view,” Alexander says during a lengthy interview at his home in Kamloops, B.C.
Continue Reading >>>> http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/no-drivers-license-no-government-at-all-legal-officials-warn-of-growing-sovereign-citizen-movement/article14071022/
Monday, April 29, 2013
The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) is one of a number of uniform acts that have been promulgated in conjunction with efforts to harmonize the law of sales and other
commercial transactions in all 50 states within the United States of America. The Uniform Commercial Code is looked upon as the bible in the world of business. Under
Caeser of Rome, it was established that all nations in the empire that do any form of business, should all play on a level field, but what is not told is that the UCC
is based directly on Vatican Canon Law, of the Roman Canon Law, which means, its regulations are under the Roman Catholic Church. Now, you maybe wondering what this
has to do with birth certificates, so let's break down the origin of birth certificates.
What is a berth? To come into or dock at a wharf such as when a ship comes into a dock, it arrives. So consequently, when a ship pulls into a port, it pulls in and
stops, that is called its berth, because the ship has now arrived. So because it is on the laws of the high seas, it is governed by the UCC Commercial Law. So when the
ship pulls in to it's berth, the first thing the captain must do is to present a certificate of manifest to the port authorities. What is a certificate of manifest? It
is a document listing a ship's contents, cargo, crew, and passengers. So whatever the ship brings in at berth, the captain has to present a certificate of manifest
showing the identity and value of the items on the ship. Now consequently, when people are born, they come out of their mother's water, therefore they must have a
birth certificate, which is a certificate of manifest, because the people are considered a corporation owned item, they are a human resource. This goes back to the
German Nazi concept, that every human coming out of their mother's water must be birthed, and therefore the people have to have a certificate of manifest, to see who
this individual is and how much they are going to make for the government in their New World Order.
Now ask yourself, have you ever, in your entire life, "signed" your name in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS? Of course not! Haven't you always used both upper and lower case
letters to sign your name? Yes. And why is that? Because that is what you have been taught since a child. Because the standard Rule of Law governing the use of English
Grammar states that the correct Capitalization of Proper Names must begin with a capital letter, and the rest of the name must be spelled in smaller case letters. At
Law, this lets others know you are an entity created by God, and not an entity created by man. Now, there are entities created by man, Corporations for example.
Corporations are known as "persons" created by the government. They are created on a piece of paper and brought into existence by the government. To differentiate
between those created by God and those created by the government, those created by the government have their names spelled in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS. This lets others
know that this entity does not have a body, soul, and spirit like man has, but that this is a fictitious entity created for the purpose of making a profit.
Now, if you look at a license, or ID Card or Birth Certificate, you will notice the name that appears on it is spelled in all capital letters! What this means, at law,
is that the entity that is named on this license is a creature of the government, and not a creature of God. It means that entity is a servant of Caesar, and not a
servant of God. Send your birth certificate back to the government or your state, and follow the path of freedom which is in the Most High. Shalom!
Friday, April 26, 2013
12 April 2013 Breaking News Military and Homeland Security to target Christians end times news update 4-12-13
A U.S. Army training instructor listed Evangelical Christianity and Catholicism as examples of religious extremism along with Al Qaeda and Hamas during a briefing with an Army Reserve unit based in Pennsylvania Fox News has learned.
We find this offensive to have Evangelical Christians and the Catholic Church to be listed among known terrorist groups," said Ron Crews, executive director of the Chaplain Alliance for Religious Liberty. It is dishonorable for any U.S. military entity to allow this type of wrongheaded characterization.
The incident occurred during an Army Reserve Equal Opportunity training brief on extremism. Topping the list is Evangelical Christianity. Other organizations listed included Catholicism, Al Qaeda, Hamas, the Ku Klux Klan, Sunni Muslims, and Nation of Islam. The military also listed Islamophobia as a form of religious extremist.
The incident was made public by a soldier who attended the briefing. He asked for copies of the presentation and sent them to the Chaplain Alliance.
"He considers himself an evangelical Christian and did not appreciate being classified with terrorists," Crews told Fox News. "There was a pervasive attitude in the presentation that anything associated with religion is an extremist."
The Archdiocese for the Military Services was shocked to learn that the Army considered Catholicism to be an example of extremism.
"The Archdiocese is astounded that Catholics were listed alongside groups that are, by their very mission and nature, violent and extremist," the Archdiocese said in a statement. They want the Dept. of Defense to ensure that taxpayer funds are never again used to present blatantly anti religious material to the men and women in uniform."
MILITARY SAYS CROSSES DISRESPECT OTHER FAITHS
ARMY SILENCES CATHOLIC CHAPLAINS
ARMY REMOVES STEEPLE, CROSSES, FROM CHAPEL
CONGRESSMAN: THERE IS WAR ON RELIGION IN MILITARY
AIR FORCE REMOVES GOD FROM LOGO
It appears that some military entities are using definitions of 'hate' and 'extreme' from the lists of anti-Christian political organizations. That violates the apolitical stance appropriate for the military."
He also wants the military to consult with chaplains about matters involving religion.
All religious issues of this sort in the U.S. military should be channeled first through the Chiefs of Chaplains offices for review," he said. "Do they really want to classify evangelicals and the Catholic Church as extremist groups?"
April 2013 Examiner reports - According to a letter written by Ron Trowbridge, undersheriff with the Prowers County, Colorado Sheriff Office, Christians who believe the Bible is the literal word of God and others who do not agree with the changes taking place in America could find themselves under scrutiny by law enforcement authorities and Homeland Security, Steven H. Ahle wrote at Red Statements Friday.
Trowbridge, a law enforcement officer with many years of experience, told Ahle that he recently attended a training session in La Junta, Colo., where, he says, Colorado State Patrol Trooper Joe Kluczynski gave a 2-hour presentation on the "sovereign citizen" movement.
According to the FBI, the "sovereign citizen movement" is made up of "anti government extremists who believe that even though they physically reside in this country, they are separate or 'sovereign' from the United States.
These people, the FBI says, do not believe they have to answer to any government authority and can cause a number of problems for law enforcement authorities.
But according to Trowbridge's letter, Kluczynski went much further, including "those who believe America was founded on godly principles, Christians who take the Bible literally, and fundamentalists.
"Kluczynski did not explain what he meant by 'fundamentalists' but from the context it was clear he was referring again to those who took the Bible literally or too seriously.
Kluczynski even later questioned some of the troopers present if they were willing and prepared to confiscate 'illegal' weapons if ordered to.
Wednesday, April 24, 2013
About French-American Foundation—United States Founded in 1976, the French-American Foundation—United States is the principal non-governmental organization linking France and the United States. Our mission is to promote a dynamic French-American partnership and to advance the values that these two countries represent. We provide high-level policymakers, academics, business leaders and other experts on both sides of the Atlantic with a platform to share knowledge and best practices on a wide range of policy issues. Our goal is to inform debate and to identify solutions to common issues of global concern.