Rebekah Caverhill Fights To Reclaim Home, Declared Embassy By Sovereign Citizen

Rebekah Caverhill Fights To Reclaim Home, Declared Embassy By Sovereign Citizen

Are you a sovereign Extremists?

The police ARE the Criminals! They are Supposed to Serve and Protect us Citizens! BUT! According to the Supreme Court they do NOT have to do any such thing! It is NOT the Citizens responsibility to protect the police, who are nothing more than Jack Booted Tax Collectors for the State!

Reclaiming Your Sovereign Citizenship - Johnny Liberty

Compliance = I submit to your guns. The state carries a invisible gun (police, tax court, etc) at all times and demands income tax to fund their agenda,which people paying have no say in where the funds go. Extortion in other words. Remove the invisible gun and this so called mandatory tax now becomes voluntary charity.

Assumption Of Liability Chapter 1:Citizenship

Are you a "U.S. Citizen?" Or are you an "American Citizen?"
Did you know that the definition of "U.S." or "United States" has three different definitions:

1) It may be the name of a sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in the family of nations, [as in the United Nations]

2) It may designate territory over which the sovereignty of the federal government extends, [Federal Zone]

3) The name of the 50 States of the Union, which are united by and under the Constitution of the United States of America [ratified 1789]. [The Republic]

Which one are you? On legal documents such as when your parents filled out a Social Security Card application, or in any American court, if you do not specify which one, the U.S. Government or the courts get to "presume" you are number 2. This is not a good thing. Watch and learn why.

Links to documents mentioned:
Assumption of Liability http://novasector.net:4280/files/lega...
Affidavit of Expatriation http://novasector.net:4280/files/lega...

Thank you for watching this video. Knowledge is power!

Sovereign Citizens Accused of Plot to Murder Nevada Cops

Authorities say the couple hatched the alleged plot to promote their anti-authority movement.

Sovereign Citizen pays fines with 70,000 pennies,for speeding and refusing to identify himself

Sovereign Citizen pays fines with 70,000 pennies,for speeding and refusing to identify himself

The Magnificent Deception - Robert Menard

ThinkFree.ca, http://HijackingHumanity.com and DivergentFilms brings you the limited edition version of The Magnificent Deception, Rob Menard's newest video on the concepts of Freedom, Law, and Commerce, and how they relate to Persons, Humans, and Freesouls-On-Land. Learn about the Notice of Understanding and Intent, and also the Claim of Right process. This is the preview version of the Sequel to Bursting Bubbles of Government Deception

Santos Bonacci - Quantum Leap TV - Syncretism in Vilcabamba, Ecuador

Santos Bonacci on Quantum Leap TV with Johnny Guzman. Recorded in May 2013.

'Quantum Leap TV presents Syncretism The Science of Light in Vilcabamba Ecuador... Join host Johnny Guzman and special guest Santos Bonacci, Keung Man and Daren Clayton... In This interview Johnny and Santos are in beautiful Vilcabamba Ecuador recording for the film "Syncretism".... Please visit our web page: www.bonaccithefilm.com and help us with your donations... For all of our previous shows subscribe to our YouTube Channel: QL Television...

Robert Menard 2013 CBC Radio interview: Setting the Record Straight

Robert Menard 2013 CBC Radio interview: Setting the Record Straight , Freeman Robert Menard - 2013 CBC Radio interview with Khalil Akhtar: Setting the Record Straight about the Freeman Movement in Canada.

The Freeman and Strawman Explained

THIS IS WHAT NEEDS TO BE TAUGHT IN SCHOOL!

Freeman Movement Attacked By Vancouver Sun

In this video I document how the Freeman On The Land movement has been attacked by the Vancouver Sun, and offer insight to the viewer onto how learning about the Freeman On The Land movement has affected my life personally. They also personally attack Dean Clifford, a great educator on the legal system in Canada.

The article can be read here: http://www.vancouversun.com/news/metr...

FREEMAN ON THE LAND UK - BEATS COURT BALIFFS & PREVENTS EVICTION ON HOME REPOSSESSION

Know your rights.

A debtor can remove right of implied access by displaying a notice at the entrance. This was endorsed by Lord Justice Donaldson in the case of Lambert v Roberts [1981] 72 Cr App R 223 - and placing such a notice is akin to a closed door but it also prevents a bailiff entering the garden or driveway, Knox v Anderton [1983] Crim LR 115 or R. v Leroy Roberts [2003] EWCA Crim 2753

Debtors can also remove implied right of access to property by telling him to leave: Davis v Lisle [1936] 2 KB 434 similarly, McArdle v Wallace [1964] 108 Sol Jo 483

A person having been told to leave is now under a duty to withdraw from the property with all due reasonable speed and failure to do so he is not thereafter acting in the execution of his duty and becomes a trespasser with any subsequent levy made being invalid and attracts a liability under a claim for damages, Morris v Beardmore [1980] 71 Cr App 256.

Bailiffs cannot force their way into a private dwelling, Grove v Eastern Gas [1952] 1 KB 77

Otherwise a door left open is an implied license for a bailiff to enter, Faulkner v Willetts [1982] Crim LR 453 likewise a person standing back to allow the bailiff to walk through but the bailiff must not abuse this license by entering by improper means or by unusual routes, Ancaster v Milling [1823] 2 D&R 714 or Rogers v Spence [1846] M&W 571

Ringing a doorbell is not causing a disturbance, Grant v Moser [1843] 5 M&G 123 or R. v Bright 4 C&P 387 nor is refusing to leave a property causes a disturbance, Green v Bartram [1830] 4 C&P 308 or Jordan v Gibbon [1863] 8 LT 391

Permission for a bailiff to enter may be refused provided the words used are not capable of being mistaken for swear words, Bailey v Wilson [1968] Crim LR 618.

If the entry is peaceful but without permission then a request to leave should always be made first. Tullay v Reed [1823] 1 C&P 6 or an employee or other person can also request the bailiff to leave, Hall v Davis [1825] 2 C&P 33

Excessive force must be avoided, Gregory v Hall [1799] 8 TR 299 or Oakes v Wood [1837] 2 M&W 791

A debtor can use an equal amount of force to resist a bailiff from gaining entry, Weaver v Bush [1795] 8TR, Simpson v Morris [1813] 4 Taunt 821, Polkinhorne v Wright [1845] 8QB 197. Another occupier of the premises or an employee may also take these steps: Hall v Davis [1825] 2 C&P 33.

Also wrongful would be an attempt at forcible entry despite resistance, Ingle v Bell [1836] 1 M&W 516

Bailiffs cannot apply force to a door to gain entry, and if he does so he is not in the execution of his duty, Broughton v Wilkerson [1880] 44 JP 781

A Bailiff may not encourage a third party to allow the bailiff access to a property (ie workmen inside a house), access by this means renders the entry unlawful, Nash v Lucas [1867] 2 QB 590

The debtor's home and all buildings within the boundary of the premises are protected against forced entry, Munroe & Munroe v Woodspring District Council [1979] Weston-Super-Mare County Court

Contrast: A bailiff may climb over a wall or a fence or walk across a garden or yard provided that no damage occurs, Long v Clarke & another [1894] 1 QB 119

It is not contempt to assault a bailiff trying to climb over a locked gate after being refused entry, Lewis v Owen [1893] The Times November 6 p.36b (QBD)

If a bailiff enters by force he is there unlawfully and you can treat him as a trespasser. Curlewis v Laurie [1848] or Vaughan v McKenzie [1969] 1 QB 557

A debtor cannot be sued if a person enters a property uninvited and injures himself because he had no legal right to enter, Great Central Railway Co v Bates [1921] 3 KB 578

If a bailiff jams his boot into a debtors door to stop him closing, any levy that is subsequently made is not valid: Rai & Rai v Birmingham City Council [1993] or Vaughan v McKenzie [1969] 1 QB 557 or Broughton v Wilkerson [1880] 44 JP 781

If a bailiff refuses to leave the property after being requested to do so or starts trying to force entry then he is causing a disturbance, Howell v Jackson [1834] 6 C&P 723 - but it is unreasonable for a police officer to arrest the bailiff unless he makes a threat, Bibby v Constable of Essex [2000] Court of Appeal April 2000.

Vaughan v McKenzie [1969] 1 QB 557 if the debtor strikes the bailiff over the head with a full milk bottle after making a forced entry, the debtor is not guilty of assault because the bailiff was there illegally, likewise R. v Tucker at Hove Trial Centre Crown Court, December 2012 if the debtor gives the bailiff a good slap.

If a person strikes a trespasser who has refused to leave is not guilty of an offence: Davis v Lisle [1936] 2 KB 434

Growing ‘sovereign citizen’ movement rejects driver’s licences, paying taxes

He introduces himself as “Brian Arthur of the Alexander family,” and before he’ll answer any questions, he asks a reporter to declare that she is not a government employee.

He drives without a license and does not pay income tax.

Brian Alexander is a self-proclaimed Freeman-on-the-Land and one of a growing number of Canadian followers of the so-called “sovereign citizen” or “Natural Persons” movement.
Adherents have “freed” themselves from what they see as an overbearing government that has overstepped its bounds.

“People can’t afford to live and they’re basically destroying society, in our view,” Alexander says during a lengthy interview at his home in Kamloops, B.C.
Continue Reading >>>> http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/no-drivers-license-no-government-at-all-legal-officials-warn-of-growing-sovereign-citizen-movement/article14071022/